|Latest 7 Posts
| MWLUG 2017 – We Believe!|
Thu, Sep 7th 2017 9
| Why we DO migrate code.|
Tue, Jun 27th 2017 6
| Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 17: Input translation and input validation formulas|
Thu, May 25th 2017 7
| Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 16: Form events|
Tue, May 23rd 2017 3
| Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 15: Private on first use folders|
Thu, May 18th 2017 2
| Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 14: Column sorting and categorizing|
Tue, May 16th 2017 4
| Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 13: Shared columns and fields|
Thu, May 11th 2017 4
| Is 2017 The Year IBM Announces the End of Life of Notes?|
Tue, May 24th 2016 28
| ICAA – Did IBM Release a Free Version of the Notes Client?|
Sun, Oct 30th 2016 13
Mon, Nov 7th 2016 12
| MWLUG 2016 Recap|
Sat, Aug 20th 2016 10
| IBM Announces a Change is Coming to the Notes & Domino Life Cycle Policy|
Fri, Aug 12th 2016 9
| MWLUG 2017 – We Believe!|
Thu, Sep 7th 2017 9
| EngageUG – Ghent Belgium|
Tue, Apr 7th 2015 8
| DOCOVA University Updated|
Fri, Nov 7th 2014 8
| DOCOVA V4.1 Overview Webinar|
Fri, May 30th 2014 8
| DOCOVA V4.5 – Feature Quick Tour|
Sun, Sep 27th 2015 7
||Is 2017 The Year IBM Announces the End of Life of Notes?
The rumor “Notes is Dead” has been going around for over a decade now, there seems to be a feeling of resignation resonating with both customers and partners that has not been there before. There are still the die hards loyal to the technology, those in the crows nest who continue to salute as the ship settles further and further into the water, but their ranks are growing thinner.
I highly doubt the Domino component of IBM Notes & Domino will disappear anytime soon. It is just too strong technically, and too entrenched with customers and IBM internally. In certain environments replication is key, and not something other technologies do well if at all. The Notes client on the other hand has become heavy and awkward. Adding Eclipse to the mix left a bad taste in a lot of mouths, and the recent chatter on many blogs suggests the Notes client could follow the same path taken by Domino.Doc, Quickr, Workplace, OS2, Warp and a number of other IBM products and technologies.
One of the first indicators of a product is near the end of its life is the frequency of new releases. Although it can be argued that the fix packs are still coming out for Notes and Domino (9.0.1 FP6 was just released with FP7 scheduled for August) new releases are another story. A good timeline of IBM Notes & Domino releases was reported on Darren Duke’s blog from September of 2015. Many business partners expected to hear about the release of 9.02 in February of this year. If that had happened, which it didn’t, it would have been 28 months since the previous release. We are now at 32 months, and counting.
At Engage in Eindhoven NL in March Inhi Cho Shu, the new GM of ICS (what used to be the Lotus Pillar in IBM) indicated to partners that the Notes/Domino road map would be revealed at the IBM Connect 2017 event in San Francisco next February. Like IBM Connect 2016 in Orlando earlier in the year, there was almost no mention of Notes/Domino at EngageUG from the IBM directly, which is odd considering this is an event that used to be called the Belgium Lotus User Group. In the actual sessions Notes & Domino was well represented by the business partners.
IBM Connect used to be called Lotusphere, and like Engage the OGS was a steady stream of IBM Connections, Cloud, Verse and Watson. This was the case in the past, but at least there was some time devoted to IBM Notes & Domino. If it happens at all now at these events it seems to be more of a whisper, and something you have to go digging for to find.
The message delivered at EngageUG and Connect 2016 is consistent if you look further up the food chain at IBM. In January of this year IBM CEO Ginni Rometty made it clear what the focus was on, and it did not cover the collaboration products. Check out the article published in The Register in the UK earlier this year.
According to a CNN report this past April, since Rometty took over as IBM CEO in 2012, the S&P 500 is up 67%, Microsoft is up 117%, but IBM is down 22%. IBM has reported their lowest quarterly earnings in the last 14 years. The pressure is on IBM to show some results to shareholders, and the “out with the old and in with the new” seems to be the message to shareholders as the way to turn the ship around.
Another indicator that the Notes client may be going away sooner rather than later is the appearance of IBM Verse. Peter Presnell from RedPillNow.com posted a blog that attempts to answer the question “what is the Lotus Notes Market Share?”.
In that post he suggests that in 2009 IBM had approximately 60% of the enterprise messaging market, and that number has fallen to a current level of only 12%. Why would IBM be investing in a new mail client for a market that is in serious decay? Some say because it is needed for the cloud. It could also be because the current mail client will not be around over the long term? Internally, IBM is converting 25,000 internal users per week from Notes email to IBM Verse, a number quoted by Ed Brill at IBM Connect 2016. Also interesting that I heard IBM has announced that Verse is now available for purchase on premises. Still trying to verify that one.
I have been an advocate of Notes & Domino for over 20 years now. At DLI we invested heavily to make our flagship DOCOVA product work on SQL simply because the risk was too high to continue to try to market a solution that runs on the Notes/Domino platform. Even with no formal statement from IBM on the future of Notes & Domino, many customers are reluctant to continue to invest in the technology. Many already have a migration plan. I have witnessed IBM selling other products to the Notes/Domino customer base for years. Eventually the bones will be picked clean. I think that point could be reached in 2017.
Do not get me wrong. This is not a doom and gloom post. If it were to happen that IBM announced the end of life of Notes it would NOT be a bad thing. The question around the future of IBM Notes & Domino has created a huge migration market. Making it official would only strengthen that market. At Engage 50% of the vendors on the showcase had some kind of migration solution. Mail migration is relatively easy and well understood, but whoever can crack the nut around migrating custom Notes applications is going to do very well.
In my opinion, the future is extremely bright indeed.
May 24, 2016
| Recent Blog Posts
MWLUG 2017 – We Believe!|
Thu, Sep 7th 2017 5:22p Gary Walsh
They call Toronto “Leaf Nation”, because so many of the population are passionate about the hockey team, the “Toronto Maple Leafs”. No matter where the team sits in the standings, they “believe”. The Notes and Domino community has been like that too over the last decade or so. Regardless of how the technology is trending, they believe it is the best.
MWLUG 2017 in Virginia this past August, like most of the Lotus User Group type events, was a gathering
Why we DO migrate code.|
Tue, Jun 27th 2017 1:28p John Ryan
I decided to write a blog entry on the issue of migrating Notes application code when migrating Notes applications to DOCOVA. When I say “code”, I mean the LotusScript and @formula language that is contained in Notes applications.
Now, I’ve seen some blogs and vendor web pages that espouse how you should NOT attempt to migrate the code. These vendors typically want to convince you that you should re-develop your Notes applications on their platforms. I get it. That repr
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 17: Input translation and input validation formulas|
Thu, May 25th 2017 1:51p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 17 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. The subject of this blog is Input translation and input validation formulas (formulae if you prefer).
Right. So, one day I hear this argument coming from down the hall here at DOCOVA. The dev team embroiled in some discussion. Oh the controversy. Fisticuffs? Naw. Heated? Maybe that would be a bit of a stretch. The debate? How should input translation and input validation formulas be handled in DOCOVA?
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 16: Form events|
Tue, May 23rd 2017 1:24p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 16 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. In this entry I’m going to talk about form events.
Okay, so the talk about form events usually starts of with the question:
Does DOCOVA have document events like onLoad, onUnload, QueryOpen, QuerySave and WebQueryOpen?
Yes. DOCOVA supports both typical browser events like onLoad and onUnload but has also been extended to handle similar events that were found in Notes forms like QueryOpen, QuerySave, PostSave and so
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 15: Private on first use folders|
Thu, May 18th 2017 1:38p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 15 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA.. In this entry I’m going to talk about good ‘ol Private on first use folders.
This is another one of those “interesting” Notes application design constructs. In my journeys I don’t think I’ve ever come across this same sort of construct in any other application environment. Anywhere. Ever. Sure, a private folder, but “…on first use” is the kicker. Interestingl
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 14: Column sorting and categorizing|
Tue, May 16th 2017 12:18p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 14 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA.. In this entry I’m going to talk about view column sorting and categorizing.
All view sorting and categorizing functionality is supported in DOCOVA. Additionally, other properties like “Show multiple values as separate entries” and showing response docs in a hierarchy are also supported.
I mean, as you get more in depth with DOCOVA, you’ll learn the breadth of the view object model and all the cool stuff
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 13: Shared columns and fields|
Thu, May 11th 2017 1:52p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 13 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. This entry is dedicated to shared columns and fields. It’s short and sweet.
DOCOVA does not support the concept of shared columns and fields between applications at this time.
Say what? I know, right? DOCOVA is so over the top, so chalk full of functionality…it’s crazy, alas at the time of writing this blog entry, it doesn’t support shared columns and fields. Well, that’s the reason ri
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 12: Multi-value fields|
Tue, May 9th 2017 12:01p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 12 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. In this entry it’s all about multi-value fields.
Notes had the concept of multi-value fields on forms. All fields were basically treated as arrays of values. For example when addressing field values in LotusScript, you might write some code like;
Dim myval = doc.myfield(0) (where doc is a NotesDocument)
Although it’s a bit of an odd duck, DOCOVA supports the same type of addressing when it comes to form
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 11: Pass-thru HTML and Generate HTML for all fields|
Thu, May 4th 2017 1:02p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 11 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. In this entry I’m going to talk about “Pass-thru HTML and Generate HTML for all fields”.
Migrate Notes to DOCOVA Blog Series Part 10: Refresh fields on keyword change|
Tue, May 2nd 2017 12:11p John Ryan
Welcome to blog series part 10 of 17 on migrating Notes apps to DOCOVA. In this entry it’s all about “Refresh fields on keyword change”.
Ya, let’s take a moment to just love this one. Have you ever used it in your Notes apps? Refresh fields on keyword change was a bit of an odd beast, no? The purpose of this operation was to enable field options (or values) to be recalculated based on the change of a selection field.
For example, if you had one keyword field on a